|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 198-202
Early experiences in the management of traumatic spinal injuries at a level 1 trauma center in India during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kamran M Farooque1, Tushar R Nayak2, Burhan S Siamwala2, Aayush Aryal2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, JPN Apex Trauma Centre, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||25-Apr-2021|
|Date of Decision||04-May-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Jun-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||16-Jul-2021|
Tushar R Nayak
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Context: Overwhelmed by COVID-19 patients requiring urgent medical attention and intensive care beds, majority of our medical resources are allocated for the management of the current pandemic. Other urgent cases requiring surgical attention also need to be optimally addressed. Aims: The aim of this article is to report the early results and organizational protocol in the management of traumatic spinal fractures at a level-1 trauma center during the current pandemic. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective study of patients with vertebral fractures operated by a single surgeon between April and October 2020. All patients were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the tests were repeated every 72 h. We modified our institutional protocol to aid the early management of emergency traumatic spine cases during this pandemic. Descriptive analysis of data collected from hospital records was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Virginia, USA, Version 20. Results: A total of 44 patients were operated. Burst fracture was the most common fracture with a fall from height being the most common mechanism of injury. Two patients tested positive for the novel corona virus. There were no complications and none of the healthcare staff involved in the patient care or patients reported symptoms of COVID-19 during a 30-day follow‐up period. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of patients with vertebral fractures, with strict adherence to personal protective measures and local guidelines, did not increase the risk of contracting SARS‐CoV2 to either healthcare workers or patients during the lockdown period.
Keywords: COVID-19, institutional protocol, lockdown, pandemic, traumatic spine injuries, vertebral fractures
|How to cite this article:|
Farooque KM, Nayak TR, Siamwala BS, Aryal A. Early experiences in the management of traumatic spinal injuries at a level 1 trauma center in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Spine J 2021;4:198-202
|How to cite this URL:|
Farooque KM, Nayak TR, Siamwala BS, Aryal A. Early experiences in the management of traumatic spinal injuries at a level 1 trauma center in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Spine J [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 4];4:198-202. Available from: https://www.isjonline.com/text.asp?2021/4/2/198/321586
| Introduction|| |
The COVID-19 pandemic has mounted unprecedented challenges on healthcare services and influenced orthopedic practices worldwide. On January 30, 2020, India confirmed its first case of COVID-19, and with a subsequent rise in cases, the government announced a 21-day nationwide lockdown from the midnight of 24th March 2020. The lockdown was extended a further three times and finally, the staging-down was started from 1st June, barring “containment zones,” with plans to unlock in phases. India currently has the largest number of confirmed cases in Asia and has the second-highest number of COVID-19 cases in the world.
Due to travel restrictions, a ban on public and religious gatherings, and sporting events, there is a significant drop in referrals to the orthopedic emergency trauma in the tertiary care centers around the world.,, Like elsewhere around the globe, elective surgeries were deferred, and life-saving procedures were to be performed under strict adherence to local protocol. The Indian Orthopaedic Association (IOA) issued guidelines for delivering emergency orthopedic and trauma care during the outbreak, with trauma services being adapted with non-operative management where possible, teleconsultations, and virtual fracture clinics. Yet, a delay in the management of vertebral fractures can compound morbidity and diminish the chances for neurological recovery.,
As a tertiary trauma referral center, we provided uninterrupted orthopedic trauma services during the lockdown period. The major concerns included:
- A) Pragmatic and ethical distribution of resources during the pandemic;
- B) Safety of healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients from the COVID-19 infection;
- C) Providing optimal patient care, despite several restrictions.
This study evaluates patients with vertebral fractures during the pandemic. We describe the institutional protocol for the management of such fractures, which allows a reduction in hospital stay and decreases the chances of the COVID-19 dissemination.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
The study was conducted at a tertiary care level-1 trauma center while lockdown was in effect from March 24, 2020. Patients with a traumatic spine fracture operated between April and October 2020 by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and intraoperative details were retrospectively collected from the medical record section.
Due to a rapid surge in COVID-19 cases, the existing trauma center was converted to a dedicated COVID-19 care facility. The trauma care facility was shifted to the main hospital block. At the emergency department, all patients and their attendants were methodically screened for COVID‐19 symptoms via a safety checklist [Figure 1]. If asymptomatic, the patients were treated at the working zone. All HCWs followed the personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols as per institutional guidelines. In patients with a suspected spinal trauma, the initial resuscitation was performed as per Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol. The neurological status was assessed using the ASIA impairment scale (AIS). As a part of the routine trauma work-up, plain radiographs and non-contrast computed tomography scans were performed with the COVID-19 risk factors mentioned on the radiology forms. For safety of healthcare professionals and other patients, COVID-19 testing was done for all patients requiring admission [either real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test (CBNAAT) of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs]. Patients with symptoms or signs suggestive of COVID-19 were isolated at a designated “GREY” area, until the COVID status was established. Any patient with a negative report for COVID-19 of greater than 72 h was retested at the Emergency Department.
|Figure 1: Checklist used for screening patients and their attendants during the lockdown|
Click here to view
Once the COVID-negative status was established, the patients were admitted, and surgery was scheduled at the earliest. The criteria for surgical intervention were defined as follows:
- 1) Cervical displacement (any AIS): urgent early <12 h;
- 2) Worsening of AIS: urgent early <12 h;
- 3) Any level AIS B, C, D: urgent <24–48 h;
- 4) Spinal cord injury with previous cervical spondylosis: urgent <36–48 h
- 5) Any level AISA-E stable: planned <72–96 h.
Descriptive analysis of data collected from hospital records was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Virginia, USA, Version 20.
| Results|| |
The baseline demographic characteristics are as demonstrated in [Table 1]. The most common type of injury was a burst fracture. The most common mechanism of injury was fall from a height. The distribution of the various injuries is as shown in [Table 1]. The most commonly affected region of the spine was thoracolumbar followed by thoracic and then lumbar spine [Figure 2].
The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grades, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of procedures are as mentioned in [Table 2]. All but two patients were negative for COVID-19 infection and no patient developed signs and symptoms suggestive of COVID‐19 within the 30 days follow‐up period. The COVID-19-positive patients (two) were referred to the dedicated COVID care facility and operated once COVID-negative. One of the patients was AISA A and the other was ASIA B, neither of them showed any change in the neurological status on testing negative. None of the members of the surgical/anesthesia team and healthcare staff involved in the management of the patients reported with symptoms of COVID-19 during the 30-day follow‐up period from the date of surgery. No complications were reported in any of the patients in the immediate 1-month follow-up period post-surgery.
| Discussion|| |
Patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic is fraught with the perils of disease transmission to both HCWs and patients. This is a deterrent to appropriate decision‐making in patient care. Guo et al. reported the outcomes of 24 orthopedic surgeons infected by the novel coronavirus from eight Wuhan hospitals. The commonly suspected site of infection was either general wards (79.2%) or public places (20.8%) visited by respondents with only 12.5% of respondents suspecting infection exposure from operating rooms. Transmission from these doctors took place most commonly among their family members (20.8%). Nevertheless, delaying surgery can significantly increase the risk of worsening or lack of improvement of the neurological deficits associated with the fractures.
Challenges faced during spinal surgery
The main challenge was to ensure the safety of the HCWs and patients admitted in the wards. Priority was given to the ergonomic allocation of resources for peri-operative care, including ICU beds and ventilators. Due to the cancellation of scheduled blood donation camps, the accessibility to blood products was a challenge. Arranging spine implants with transportation restrictions was difficult during the early lockdown periods. As the lockdown restrictions eased out, the transport situation gradually improved and was near normal during the 4th month following the announcement of the lockdown.
Modifications of our management protocol during the pandemic
Irrespective of the contact or travel history and symptoms, all patients before being admitted in the wards underwent a CBNAAT/RT-PCR-based COVID-19 test. All patients were observed in the emergency department and shifted to the wards, only after a negative test. Two of the forty-four cases, who had initially tested COVID-positive, were referred to the designated COVID center for further care. Once the two patients tested COVID-19-negative, the patients were shifted back and operated upon [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Organizational flowchart for the management of traumatic spinal injuries|
Click here to view
After initial screening for the indications for surgery, evaluation of risk factors, predicted operative course, and requirements of hospital resources were assessed. These comprised ICU bed requirements, need for blood and blood products, consultations from allied departments, and duration of hospital stay. The scheduling of surgery was based on the current recommendations and guidelines., The surgeries were performed sooner than the 72–96-h proposed period.
Anesthetists are among the healthcare workers at the highest risk of exposure. All pre-anesthetic evaluations were performed following a COVID-19-negative report. On the day of surgery, reassessment was done to look for COVID-19 risk factors. As a part of institutional policy, all COVID reports were valid only for a period of 72 h. If the 72-h period was exceeded, a repeat test was performed. To reduce the risk of transmission in operating rooms, the senior-most anesthetist performed intubation, and the operating team of surgeons stayed away during the induction, intubation, and extubation.
Routinely performed procedures such as open suctioning, smoke-generating procedures (mono/bipolar diathermy), and opening of pressurized cavities are considered as high risk for COVID transmission. Pulse lavage irrigation of the wound during surgery was avoided to reduce aerosol generation. Nevertheless, electrocautery had to be used, albeit minimally to minimize intraoperative blood loss. As for the above reasons, minimally invasive surgeries were preferred over open surgeries wherever possible (9 out of 44 cases). As there is a possibility of a change in COVID status during admission, viral screening was repeated after 72 h of admission, with close attention to possible symptoms. Consultant-led patient review was performed daily, with the extension of imaging to include chest screening when needed.
There was a reduction in the number of orthopedic spine surgeries performed during the first five months after the lockdown. The difference was largely due to (1) reduced presentation of spine trauma patients in the emergency department due to the lockdown restrictions and (2) conservative management of the cases which had borderline operative indications. Any procedure that was considered “semi-elective,” such as those for acute traumatic lumbar disc herniations without neurological deficit, was avoided on the first instance, and patients were advised conservative management. However, as ours is a tertiary referral center, catering to patients from different parts of our country, we had a substantial load of spine trauma cases.
Apart from routine hospital visits for a wound check, teleconsultation services were also provided to our patients. All patients had a minimum follow‐up of 30 days following surgery. Initially, patients were followed up at the emergency department, and once the OPDs were functioning, patients were followed up at the OPDs. During the follow‐up, apart from the routine examination, each patient was specifically asked for symptomatic evidence of COVID‐19. None of them reported any such symptoms.
This is a preliminary report on the management of traumatic spine injuries, and therefore it is not free of limitations. One of the limitations of the study is long-term follow-up data on outcomes of surgery and survival or COVID-associated complications of patients were not available due to the study period. Our protocol of management would need further validation over time.
| Conclusion|| |
Surgical treatment of patients with vertebral fractures, with strict adherence to personal protective measures and local guidelines, did not increase the risk of contracting SARS‐CoV2 to either HCWs or patients during the lockdown period. The management algorithm reduced the hospitalization period by maximizing the healthcare resources available and simultaneously reducing COVID spread.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Rawat M. Coronavirus in India: Tracking country’s first 50 COVID-19 cases; what numbers tell. India Today March 2020;12:1.
Withnall A. India to go into nationwide lockdown. The Independent 2020;24:1-2.
Saha J, Chouhan P. Lockdown and unlock for the COVID-19 pandemic and associated residential mobility in India. Int J Infect Dis 2021;104:382-9.
WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int. [Accessed January 14, 2021].
Bram JT, Johnson MA, Magee LC, Mehta NN, Fazal FZ, Baldwin KD, et al
. Where have all the fractures gone? The epidemiology of pediatric fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Pediatr Orthop 2020;40:373-9.
Greenhalgh M, Dupley L, Unsworth R, Boden R. Where did all the trauma go? A rapid review of the demands on orthopaedic services at a UK major trauma centre during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e13690.
Gormeli Kurt N, Gunes C. How has Covid-19 pandemic affected crowded emergency services? Int J Clin Pract 2020;74:e13624.
Association IO. COVID-19 IOA Guidelines. ioaindia.org Internet; 2020.
Schinkel C, Frangen TM, Kmetic A, Andress HJ, Muhr G; German Trauma Registry. Timing of thoracic spine stabilization in trauma patients: Impact on clinical course and outcome. J Trauma 2006;61:156-60; discussion 160.
Frangen TM, Ruppert S, Muhr G, Schinkel C. The beneficial effects of early stabilization of thoracic spine fractures depend on trauma severity. J Trauma 2010;68:1208-12.
Furlan JC, Noonan V, Cadotte DW, Fehlings MG. Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: An evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Neurotrauma 2011;28:1371-99.
Guo X, Wang J, Hu D, Wu L, Gu L, Wang Y, et al
. Survey of COVID-19 disease among orthopaedic surgeons in Wuhan, People’s Republic of China. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:847-54.
Kato S, Murray JC, Kwon BK, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG. Does surgical intervention or timing of surgery have an effect on neurological recovery in the setting of a thoracolumbar burst fracture? J Orthop Trauma 2017;31(Suppl. 4):38-43.
Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, Aarabi B, Anderson P, Arnold PM, et al
. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury and central cord syndrome: Recommendations on the timing (≤ 24 hours versus> 24 hours) of decompressive surgery. Glob Spine J 2017;7(3_suppl):195S-202S.
Chen X, Liu Y, Gong Y, Guo X, Zuo M, Li J, et al
; Chinese Society of Anesthesiology, Chinese Association of Anesthesiologists. Perioperative management of patients infected with the novel coronavirus: Recommendation from the Joint Task Force of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology and the Chinese Association of Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2020;132:1307-16.
Orser BA. Recommendations for endotracheal intubation of COVID-19 patients. Anesth Analg 2020;130:1109-10.
van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al
. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1564-7.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2]